I should like to laugh heartily at these buffoons but they are trying to radically remake the world. Fools trying to change the world to their own image - one just cannot laugh.
If George W. Bush had said this there would have been an interminable resounding of guffaws all the way from the offices of the New York Times to those of the Hindustan Times and beyond. Boor, bumpkin, oaf- would be a fraction of adjectives commonly used a million times in the media all over the world.
But, unfortunately for the embedded media (embedded deep in Obama's ass), Bush did not say it, Obama did-
Would health care reform bring "greater inefficiencies" to the country's health care system?
That's exactly what Obama said Monday when he spoke about health care reform at the Childrens National Medical Center in Washington.
"The reforms we seek would bring greater competition, choice, savings and inefficiencies to our health care system," Obama said in remarks after a health care roundtable with physicians, nurses and health care providers. "And greater stability and security to America's families and businesses."
I wonder how will this be reported. On other hand this might not be a gaffe -his monster healthcare bill promises to bust the bank even more than he already has with trillions in stimulus and bailouts already down the drain. Perhaps he is seeking inefficiencies - and with great success!
Is this real or a photoshop(from the same site linked to in the post below)?-
Each year, millions of farmers in India hope and pray for the right kind of monsoon rains to help grow their crops. But it’s believed climate change is delaying the onset of the monsoon - threatening crops and pushing up the prices of basic foods. .
I think we can have a standard template where one can put in just anything in the blanks, say-
Manisha Koirala had become very obesedue to global warming. She has now lost much weight. Her weight loss wascaused by climate change.
You get the idea. Now children, fill up the blanks in your own words. The most alarming one will get a prize.Really scary enough and it might even fetch the clever student a Nobel prize. You may copy from the notes of Rajendra and Al -our finest pupils.
To the left a black is a black, not a human being that can be dissociated from his skin color.He is a perpetual victim and an oppressed minority that the leftists will feel good by enacting expensive and discriminatory(affirmative-action, quotas) laws to "help" him.In exchange they expect the minorities to be co-ideologists.
So a colored person who does not believe in the leftist drivel poses a special kind of challenge to them.Harry Alford, representing the National Black Chamber of Commerce is one such person.
His exchange with Barbara Boxer during a meeting with the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is a must watch-
Harry Alford, representing the National Black Chamber of Commerce lashed out at Senator Barbara Boxer during a meeting with the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Alter was challenging Boxer’s position on climate change legislation – specifically, Boxer’s contention that green jobs were being created in California.
Alter responded by telling Boxer:
“The last time I checked California is an economic basket case and these green jobs aren’t going to solve it.”
Well, that’s when the fireworks began. After citing a PEW study on climate change, Boxer decided to patronize Alter by citing “resolutions” and statements – not research - from the NAACP and John Grant, CEO of 100 Black Men of Atlanta.
Alter quite rightly exploded, asking Boxer what statements from other black men have to do with determining the truth of climate change legislation.
"All that's condescending and I don't like it. It's racial. I take offense to it. As an African-American and a veteran of this country, I take offense to that. You're quoting some other black man -- why don't you quote some other Asian or some other... You're getting racial here."
Boxer’s strategy of citing other black men in order to persuade Mr. Alter didn’t quite cut it with this penetrating and astute gentleman:
"We've been looking at energy policy since 1996. And we are referring to the experts, regardless of their color. And for someone to tell me, an African-American, college-education veteran of the United States Army, that I must contend with some other "black group" and put aside everything else in here -- This has NOTHING to do with the NAACP, and really has nothing to do with the National Black Chamber of Commerce. We're talking about energy. And that -- that road the chair went down, I think is God awful."
When will liberals stop patronizing minorities in America?
It has been evident for a long time now the something is not right with the "human rights" groups.Noble in theory but they are like a senile and diseased wreck hiding his sores under a cloak. One of the sores recently came out in open-
For years it has been clear to those who bear the brunt of criticism from human rights watchdogs like Amnesty and the UN Human Rights Council, that something is wrong with the international system aimed at exposing gross violations and war crimes. The overwhelmingly disproportionate criticism heaped on Israel and other democratic states, and the near blindness to the brutal oppression that takes place in dozens of other countries, especially Arab states, makes the entire pretense of international human rights law look like a sham.
But last week, one of these bodies was caught with its pants down. Two months ago, the Saudi-based newspaper Arab News described a fund-raising event for Human Rights Watch held in the Saudi kingdom, where high-level Saudi dignitaries were treated to a powerful presentation where the organization not only petitioned the brutal elites for funding, but paraded the fact that they were doing battle against pro-Israel pressure groups in the West — a clear repudiation of their purportedly objective status. ------------------------
All this is very damning for an organization that for years has tried rebuffing accusations of being blatantly anti-Israel. As one commentator writing at the (British) Spectator put it, “Whatever Israel’s faults, there is something deeply wrong about a human rights organisation trying to raise money in a religiously oppressive monarchical state out of criticising a liberal democracy. It does make one wonder how people committed to human rights can get it so wrong.”
It also makes one wonder how the world can continue to take such organizations so seriously.
Well, they are leftists first, human rights campaigners later. Read the whole thing.
This is an appeal to save one the most helpful entities on this planet- the plastic bag which has become a endangered species thanks to the predatory and unsustainable practices of environmentalists and politicians.
Mother earth and the humanity are now belaboring under the reckless overpopulation of these two hegemonic groups who will not let the rest of us live in peace without their overbearing meddling.
So let's - BAN SHEILA DIXIT, NOT PLASTIC BAGS BAN SUNITA NARAIN, NOT PLASTIC BAGS
Saturday, July 18, 2009
I agree, Steve- Some statements are inherently unbelievable. Such as: "I am an official of the government of Nigeria, and I would like to deposit $60 million in your bank account." Or: "I'm Barry Bonds, and I thought it was flaxseed oil." And this new one: "I'm Barack Obama, and I favor more competition in health insurance."
I am wondering if the trial will be over, By the time the Judge finishes reading 11,000 pages, Or will the Judge himself be over? By the time he gets through 11,000 pages.
But thanks to Kasab, And all those pages, I have become richer, Because I invested in paper.
Because of Kasab , The candle makers are happy, Thanks to all the depression, The sales have picked up even in the recession:
Now where Kasab is, That’s where all the high security is, If they had put that security at India's Gateway, Then our country wouldn’t have to go through fate's terrible way.
All you Obama-poodles out there in the media -yes, I mean you, Burkha Dutt, among others- will you be publicizing this book or will you give it the "never heard about it" treatment?
When animals kill then is it murder? BBC seems to think so- according to it dogs and foxes are "suspects" in the "murder" of penguins.
I say arrest all tigers and lions -they might even survive better in jails than under the protection of government-NGO axis.That is unless they get capital punishment.
Hey, I thought we were in a global-warming crisis where we needed drastic measures. This looks more like business as usual to me. Perhaps if they acted like there was a crisis, more people would believe there was a crisis.
Obama is a symbol of everything wrong in higher education today:He has graduated Columbia and Harvard Law School with a head full of a fluff, no substance. He throws around words that are in vogue among the academicians, but it is clear that he (and probably they) have no notion of what they mean.
It's hard to disagree.That university faculties have gone ga-ga for Obama is no secret.They love him as much as they hated Reagan.It is like a clear symptom of a deep-rooted disease.
